The usual blender mistake is buying a big jug "to be safe" and then using it once a fortnight for soup. How you cook decides the type, and for a lot of kitchens the cheaper machine is the right one.

What each one is actually for

JobStickJug
Soup, blended in the potYes, this is its jobWorks, in batches, with a hot-liquid risk
Smoothie with frozen fruitStrugglesYes
Crushing iceNoYes, with a powerful motor
Mayonnaise and emulsionsYes, better than a jugAwkward
Baby food, small amountsYesToo big to bother
Nut butterNoSlowly, with a strong motor
Milkshakes for fourNoYes
Chopping onions, herbsWith the chopper attachmentPoorly; it purées

The stick blender case

It blends in whatever pot or jug the food is already in, which removes the step that stops people using a jug blender: decanting hot soup, then washing a large jug. Washing a stick takes ten seconds under a tap. It stores in a drawer. It costs a fraction of a good jug blender, and for soup, sauces, baby food and emulsions it does a better job because you control where the blade goes.

What it cannot do is work against resistance. Frozen fruit, ice, and anything fibrous will either stall it or leave lumps, and no amount of wattage in a stick fixes the fundamental problem that the blade is small and the food can move away from it.

The jug blender case

A jug blender earns its counter space when you make drinks. Smoothies with frozen fruit, iced coffee, milkshakes, frozen cocktails: these need a vortex and a blade that food cannot escape, and that is what a jug is. It also wins on volume, because making four portions of anything in a stick blender is a chore.

Two things matter more than the wattage on the box. Blade design and jug shape decide whether the mixture circulates or spins a hole around the blades, which is the churning-with-nothing-happening problem people blame on power. And a dishwasher-safe jug decides how often the machine gets used, exactly as with the stick.

How to tell which one you are

Look at what you cooked in the last month rather than what you intend to cook. If the list is mostly soups, sauces and the occasional puree, buy a stick blender and spend the saved money on a better one with a chopper attachment and a whisk. If a smoothie appears more than twice a week, or anyone in the house wants frozen drinks, buy the jug. If you have both patterns, the honest answer is that a good stick blender plus a cheap personal blender for drinks costs less than one good jug blender and covers more ground.

The mistakes that waste money

  • Buying on wattage. A high number on a poor blade design blends worse than a moderate motor with a good one.
  • Buying a jug too big for the household. A large jug needs a minimum volume to circulate; a single smoothie in a huge jug just spins.
  • Assuming a jug blender does hot soup. Most jugs are not made for blending soup hot from the pan, and steam builds pressure under the lid. Let it cool, work in batches, or use a stick.
  • Ignoring the noise. Powerful jug blenders are genuinely loud, which matters in a flat or with a sleeping child in the house.
  • Forgetting where it lives. A jug blender left in a cupboard because it does not fit under the cabinets is money spent on a machine you will not use.

The short version

Soup, sauces and small jobs: a stick blender, and you will use it weekly. Smoothies, ice and drinks for more than one: a jug blender, sized to the household rather than to the ambition. If you are shopping at the jug end and want to know what a strong motor and a stacked blade design buy you, our review of the Ninja BN701 goes through it, including the loading order that stops a blender spinning without blending.

ReviewPanel guide illustration comparing a stick blender with a jug blender.
Save for later

Found this review helpful?

Pin it to one of your boards and come back to it whenever you need a reminder.

Isabella Romano
Written by

Isabella Romano

Kitchen & Cooking Products Expert Writes about Kitchen

Isabella writes about the things that live on a kitchen counter: air fryers, blenders, kettles and the cast iron that outlives all of them. She cooks for a household of five, so her measure of a good appliance is whether it survives a year of being used badly.

Comments

No comments yet.

Join the discussion. Comments are moderated before appearing.

Leave a reply

Your email will not be published. Comments are moderated before appearing.

Your name, email address and comment are processed to publish and reply to the comment; your email address is never published. Details: Privacy Notice.